Foreign Influence in US Elections: Analyzing Russia, China, and Iran's Activities
Understanding the Dynamics and Implications
Foreign interference threatens U.S. elections substantially, and intelligence agencies have uncovered several state-sponsored campaigns that target democratic processes. China and Russia have launched sophisticated operations to influence voter opinions and electoral outcomes through digital platforms. These coordinated efforts have grown more advanced with time, and they use cutting-edge technological tools and psychological tactics to shape public discussions.
These influence operations work differently for each nation, reflecting their unique goals and strategies. Russian operatives spread disinformation through social media and fake news sites, while Chinese efforts target specific congressional races. Iranian cyber operations and anti-U.S. messaging campaigns add another dimension to these threats that American democracy faces.
Russia's Disinformation Tactics
New investigations show how Russia has developed a more sophisticated strategy to interfere with elections through advanced technological capabilities and changed tactics. The Justice Department discovered an intricate network of Russian-backed operations that investing nearly $10 million to create content through U.S.-based companies.
Social media campaigns
Russian social media tactics have grown more sophisticated, moving beyond basic bot networks to AI-powered fake profiles and authentic influencers. Researchers have identified a network called "Storm-1516" as a major player that has spreading at least 54 different disinformation narratives online since August 2023. Their operations rely on:
AI-powered systems that control hundreds of accounts designed to appear American
Social media influencers who generate billions of views through paid promotions
Complex distribution networks that spread content across multiple platforms
Fake news websites
The Justice Department seized 32 internet domains that spread Russian propaganda. These websites used advanced deception techniques to create fronts that looked identical to legitimate American news sources. Russian operatives created fake domains that impersonated well-known publications like The Miami Chronicle, The Boston Times, and DC Weekly.
Exploiting divisive issues
Russian operatives have mastered their approach to exploiting social divisions and show a deep understanding of American political discourse. Their strategy targets existing societal tensions instead of creating new conflicts. A senior European intelligence source explains that this ecosystem works through different motivations. Some participants chase financial gains while others follow their ideological beliefs.
These operations show remarkable sophistication in their use of multiple platforms and technologies. Russian disinformation groups now hire marketing and communications firms within Russia to create content while keeping their operations secure. This professional approach to influence operations marks a major shift from earlier campaigns.
These efforts have created substantial results. Some influenced content gets more than 16 million views on YouTube alone. Russian operatives excel at targeting swing states and specific voter groups. They adapt their messages to connect with local concerns and existing political narratives.
These coordinated campaigns showcase advanced foreign interference capabilities that blend traditional propaganda techniques with cutting-edge digital technologies and precise psychological targeting. Russia shows steadfast dedication to long-term influence campaigns. Their budgets for such activities grew by 70% between 2016 and 2018.
China's Targeted Influence Operations
Chinese influence operations have changed dramatically. Intelligence reports show a sophisticated approach that targets specific congressional races and uses social media platforms for the greatest effect. The campaign, known as "Spamouflage" or "Dragonbridge," uses thousands of accounts across more than 50 websites and social media platforms.
Focus on congressional races
Chinese influence operations specifically target several prominent Republican lawmakers who criticize Chinese policies. The main targets include:
Representative Barry Moore (Alabama)
Representative Michael McCaul (Texas)
Senator Marsha Blackburn (Tennessee)
Senator Marco Rubio (Florida)
These lawmakers became targets because they denounced Chinese government policies consistently. A group called Taizi Flood used sophisticated tactics that spread corruption accusations and supported opposition candidates.
Opposing Taiwan-friendly candidates
Beijing strongly opposes candidates who support Taiwan's independence. The Chinese government has showed fierce resistance against politicians who reject its sovereignty claims over Taiwan. Their opposition shows up through coordinated social media campaigns and targeted messaging efforts. Chinese officials have made their stance clear about using "maximum pressure campaigns" against administrations that maintain pro-Taiwan positions.
Covert social media activities
China's social media operations have grown more sophisticated. Spamouflage has become "more aggressive in its efforts to infiltrate and sway U.S. political conversations". Their tactics include:
Platform Diversification: Spamouflage's operation spans multiple social media platforms. Graphika has identified 15 accounts on X and several profiles on TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram.
Content Engagement: A TikTok account called "Harlan Report" reached a wide audience when one of its videos gained 1.5 million views. The operation has successfully connected with authentic American audiences, especially since mid-2023.
The campaign's messaging remains neutral between Democrats and Republicans but wants to increase existing criticisms of American society and government. This represents a major change from China's previous strategy. A 2021 U.S. intelligence community assessment had concluded that China chose not to interfere in the 2020 election.
These operations show growing sophistication in targeting local and state elections that get less attention than national races. Beijing's efforts aim to create political division that could weaken national resilience and cybersecurity while advancing its strategic interests in American politics.
Iran's Cyber and Influence Efforts
The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has stepped up its cyber operations against U.S. election infrastructure. This represents the most important increase in Iran's interference activities. Microsoft's Threat Analysis Center has detected several sophisticated campaigns that target election systems and presidential campaigns.
Hacking attempts on campaigns
Iranian state-sponsored actors have showed more advanced capabilities in their cyber operations. The IRGC-linked group "Cotton Sandstorm" conducts reconnaissance of election-related websites in multiple swing states. Their activities include:
Probing state election infrastructure to find vulnerabilities
Targeting campaign officials with spear-phishing attacks
Running hack-and-leak operations on campaign documents
Taking control of political advisers' email accounts
IRGC hackers stole non-public information from former President Trump's campaign and shared it with media outlets in a notable operation. The Justice Department charged three Iranian nationals for this "wide-ranging" malicious cyber scheme.
Spreading anti-US narratives
Iranian influence operations now include sophisticated disinformation campaigns on multiple platforms. A group called "Storm-2035" runs a network of websites that pose as local U.S. news outlets. Their content targets both Democrats and Republicans to create division. Iranian operatives have become more sophisticated and now use AI tools to generate social media posts and write false news articles.
The IRGC's 5-year old network of influence operatives works through front companies. Their key tactics include:
Creating fake news agencies that interact with American media outlets
Using "troll teams" on social media platforms
Taking advantage of social issues to create deeper domestic divisions
Potential post-election disruption
U.S. intelligence reports reveal Iran stands ready to interfere after elections. The U.S. National Intelligence Council warns that Iranian actors know how to "better prepare to exploit opportunities to exert influence" once polls close. Their planned activities include:
Immediate Post-Election Threats:
Casting doubt on election legitimacy
Launching targeted cyber attacks on election systems
Spreading unrest through information warfare
Intelligence agencies have spotted specific risks about Iran's access to voter information in 27 states. Iranian operatives could use this data to launch focused disinformation campaigns, just as they did in 2020 when they posed as the Proud Boys group.
Iranian cyber teams have shown they can step up their operations. They successfully breached election websites and stole data. These actions haven't affected actual voting systems yet, but they mark a serious attempt to shake voter confidence and disrupt democratic processes.
Protecting Election Integrity
America's electoral system needs a complete approach with multiple federal agencies, technology platforms, and public education initiatives. The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) confirms that local and state election officials implement security measures and serve as trusted election information sources throughout the year.
Government agency coordination
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) guides a collaborative effort with multiple federal partners to protect election infrastructure. CISA works with over 10,000 election jurisdictions nationwide. The protection framework works through these essential phases:
Threat Assessment: Intelligence agencies review foreign threats
Infrastructure Protection: Physical and cyber security measures
Information Sharing: Immediate threat intelligence updates
Response Planning: Coordinated incident management
Recovery Operations: Post-incident restoration protocols
The Department of Homeland Security's 2-year old dedicated election security task force works with state and local officials. The task force implements various testing methods to verify that voting system hardware and software work correctly.
Social media platform policies
Social media platforms have taken steps to curb election interference, and recent analysis shows some worrying trends. User interaction with election content has dropped by a lot on these platforms:
Meta platforms report a 65% drop in political content reach
TikTok has cut back on content moderator numbers
YouTube faces questions about its election integrity measures
Twitter/X has changed its content policies
Studies show that political advertisers spent over $619 million on Google and Meta platforms from January 2023 through August 2024. These platform policies haven't consistently stopped election misinformation, and users have spotted several policy violations on major platforms.
Voter education initiatives
Election officials have created complete voter education programs that help build resilience against foreign influence operations. These programs work through several channels:
The EAC's "Rumor vs. Reality" program gives accurate and reliable information about election infrastructure security. This program tackles common misconceptions and foreign influence attempts directly.
State and local election officials use various ballot processing and tabulation safeguards to ensure accurate vote counting. Their measures need at least two witnesses from bipartisan teams who verify each step through strict chain of custody procedures.
The Brennan Center points out several critical infrastructure improvements needed in the election system:
Replacing outdated voting machines
Upgrading voter registration databases
Conducting full audits of paper ballots
Performing regular risk assessments
CISA acts as the federal government's national coordinator for critical infrastructure security. They work closely with election officials at state and local levels to identify and defend against cyber, physical, and operational security risks. Their complete approach uses regular training sessions and incident response planning to maintain readiness throughout the election cycle.
The security framework protects physical infrastructure through multiple security layers. Storage facilities use biometric access controls, surveillance systems, and strict logging policies. Regular system testing and audits verify the election equipment's integrity and processes effectively.
TLDR
Foreign interference in U.S. elections has reached new levels of complexity. Russia, China, and Iran now use advanced tech tools and refined psychological tactics. These countries have shown quick adaptation skills. They moved beyond basic disinformation campaigns to complex operations across multiple platforms that target specific demographics, races, and electoral processes. Russian operations now use AI-enhanced content creation. Chinese influence campaigns target congressional races, while Iranian actors mix cyber operations with targeted messaging campaigns.
American democracy faces major challenges as these foreign influence operations evolve. Federal agencies, tech platforms, and election officials have built resilient security measures. These include complete voter education programs, better cybersecurity protocols, and coordinated threat response systems. The fight against these threats needs constant watchfulness, tech advancement, and strong teamwork. Government agencies, private sector partners, and informed citizens must work together to protect electoral integrity.
[Want to discuss this further? Hit me up on Twitter or LinkedIn]
[Subscribe to the RSS feed for this blog]
[ Subscribe to the Bi-weekly Copilot for Security Newsletter]
[Subscribe to the Weekly SIEM and XDR Newsletter]
[Learn KQL with the Must Learn KQL series and book]
[Learn AI Security with the Must Learn AI Security series and book]
** Need a Tech break?? Sure, we all do! Check out my fiction novels: https://RodsFictionBooks.com