This post is part of an ongoing series to educate about new and known security vulnerabilities against AI.
The full series index (including code, queries, and detections) is located here:
https://aka.ms/MustLearnAISecurity
The book version (pdf) of this series is located here: https://github.com/rod-trent/OpenAISecurity/tree/main/Must_Learn/Book_Version
The book will be updated when each new part in this series is released.
Periodically, throughout the Must Learn AI Security series, there will be a need to envelop previous chapters and prepare for upcoming chapters. These Compendiums serve as juncture points for the series, even though they might function well as standalone articles. So, welcome! This post serves as one of those compendiums. It’ll all make much more sense as the series progresses.
Zero Trust for Artificial Intelligence
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming the world in unprecedented ways, enabling new capabilities, enhancing productivity, and improving lives. However, AI also poses significant challenges and risks, such as ethical dilemmas, bias, privacy breaches, security threats, and adversarial attacks. How can we ensure that AI systems are trustworthy, reliable, and secure? How can we protect AI systems from malicious actors who seek to exploit their vulnerabilities or manipulate their outcomes? How can we verify that AI systems are behaving as intended and aligned with our values and goals?
One possible answer is to adopt a Zero Trust approach to AI. Zero Trust is a cybersecurity paradigm that assumes no trust for any entity or interaction within a network, and requires continuous verification and authorization for every request and transaction. Zero Trust aims to prevent unauthorized access, data breaches, and supply chain attacks by implementing strict policies, controls, and monitoring mechanisms across the entire digital infrastructure.
Zero Trust for AI extends this concept to the AI domain, where any critical AI-based product or service should be continuously questioned and evaluated. This suggests a “trust, but verify” attitude towards AI systems, where we do not blindly trust their outputs or decisions, but rather validate their inputs, processes, and outcomes using various methods and techniques. Zero Trust for AI also implies that we do not assume that AI systems are inherently benign or benevolent, but rather anticipate and mitigate potential harms or risks that they may cause or encounter.
Some of the key principles and practices of Zero Trust for AI include:
Data Protection: Data is the fuel of AI systems, and it should be protected at all stages of the AI lifecycle, from collection to processing to storage to transmission. Data protection measures include encryption, anonymization, access control, auditing, backup, and recovery. Data protection also involves ensuring data quality, integrity, and provenance, as well as complying with data privacy and governance regulations.
Identity Management: Identity management involves verifying the identity and credentials of every user or device that interacts with an AI system, and granting them the minimum level of access required to perform their tasks. Identity management also involves monitoring user or device behavior and activity, and detecting and responding to any anomalies or threats.
Secure Development: Secure development involves applying security best practices and standards throughout the AI development process, from design to deployment to maintenance. Secure development also involves conducting security testing and assessment at every stage of the AI lifecycle, using tools such as code analysis, vulnerability scanning, penetration testing, and threat modeling.
Adversarial Defense: Adversarial defense involves protecting AI systems from malicious attacks that aim to compromise their functionality or performance. Adversarial defense also involves developing robust and resilient AI systems that can detect, resist, or recover from adversarial perturbations or manipulations.
Explainability and Transparency: Explainability and transparency involve providing clear and understandable explanations for how an AI system works, what data it uses, how it makes decisions, and what outcomes it produces. Explainability and transparency also involve disclosing the limitations, uncertainties, assumptions, and trade-offs of an AI system, as well as its ethical implications and social impacts.
Accountability and Auditability: Accountability and auditability involve ensuring that an AI system is responsible for its actions and outcomes, and that it can be held accountable for any errors or harms that it may cause or incur. Accountability and auditability also involve enabling independent verification and validation of an AI system’s behavior and performance using methods such as logging, tracing, auditing, certification, or regulation.
Zero Trust for AI is not a one-size-fits-all solution or a silver bullet product. It is a holistic framework that requires a layered security approach that covers the entire AI infrastructure. It also requires a multidisciplinary collaboration among various stakeholders such as developers, operators, users, regulators, auditors, researchers, ethicists, and policymakers. By adopting Zero Trust for AI principles and practices we can enhance the trustworthiness of our AI systems while reducing their risks.
[Want to discuss this further? Hit me up on Twitter or LinkedIn]
[Subscribe to the RSS feed for this blog]
[Subscribe to the Weekly Microsoft Sentinel Newsletter]
[Subscribe to the Weekly Microsoft Defender Newsletter]
[Subscribe to the Weekly Azure OpenAI Newsletter]
[Learn KQL with the Must Learn KQL series and book]
[Learn AI Security with the Must Learn AI Security series and book]