Discover more from Rod’s Blog
Must Learn AI Security Part 14: Inference Attacks Against AI
This post is part of an ongoing series to educate about new and known security vulnerabilities against AI.
The full series index (including code, queries, and detections) is located here:
The book version (pdf) of this series is located here: https://github.com/rod-trent/OpenAISecurity/tree/main/Must_Learn/Book_Version
The book will be updated when each new part in this series is released.
What is an Inference attack against AI?
An inference attack against AI refers to an attempt by an adversary to gain sensitive or private information from an AI system, typically by exploiting its input-output behavior. In these attacks, the adversary uses the system's output predictions, along with other available information, to infer information that the system's designers or users may not have intended to disclose.
Inference attacks pose a significant risk to the privacy and security of AI systems, particularly in contexts where sensitive or personal information is involved, such as healthcare, finance, or social networks.
Types of Inference attacks
There are two main types of inference attacks:
Model Inversion Attacks: In this type of attack, the adversary aims to reconstruct the input data or sensitive attributes used to train the AI model by querying the model with specially crafted inputs. For example, an attacker may try to infer the facial features of an individual from a facial recognition system's output by submitting multiple queries and analyzing the system's responses.
Membership Inference Attacks: In this attack, the adversary tries to determine whether a specific data point was part of the AI system's training dataset or not. By analyzing the model's predictions and confidence scores, the attacker can infer whether the data point was used during the training process, potentially revealing sensitive information about the individuals or entities whose data was used.
How it works
Inference attacks against AI exploit the input-output behavior of an AI system to gain sensitive or private information. The attacker typically relies on the AI system's outputs, confidence scores, or other observable information to infer details about the training data or the model's internal workings. Here's a brief overview of how the two main types of inference attacks work:
The attacker starts by querying the AI system with carefully crafted inputs or known data points.
The attacker then analyzes the output responses and confidence scores provided by the AI system.
Based on the observed outputs, the attacker attempts to reconstruct the input data or sensitive attributes used to train the model. This could involve creating an inverse mapping between the output and input spaces or using optimization techniques to reconstruct the inputs.
The attacker first gathers some background knowledge about the AI system, such as its architecture, confidence scores for various inputs, or any information about the training data.
The attacker then queries the AI system with data points, some of which may be part of the training dataset and some not.
By analyzing the model's predictions and confidence scores for these queries, the attacker tries to distinguish between the data points that were part of the training set and those that were not.
Inference attacks rely on the attacker's ability to access the AI system and gather sufficient information about its input-output behavior. To execute a successful inference attack, the attacker may require multiple queries, a deep understanding of the AI system's architecture, or knowledge of the statistical properties of the training data.
Why it matters
An inference attack against AI can have several negative effects on the targeted system, its users, and the organization responsible for the system. Some of these negative effects include:
Privacy violation: Inference attacks can reveal sensitive information about the training data or specific individuals involved in the dataset. This can lead to a violation of privacy and potential legal consequences, especially when dealing with personal or confidential information.
Loss of trust: Users may lose trust in the AI system and the organization responsible for it if they believe their private information is not adequately protected. This loss of trust can result in reduced user engagement, negative publicity, and potential damage to the organization's reputation.
Legal and regulatory consequences: In some jurisdictions, privacy breaches can result in fines, lawsuits, or regulatory penalties. Organizations that fail to protect user data from inference attacks may face legal consequences and financial liabilities.
Intellectual property theft: In some cases, inference attacks can reveal proprietary information about the AI model, its architecture, or the techniques used to train it. This can lead to theft of intellectual property and loss of competitive advantage.
Compromised decision-making: If the AI system is responsible for making critical decisions, the success of an inference attack could compromise the decision-making process and lead to suboptimal or biased outcomes.
To minimize the negative effects of inference attacks, it is crucial for organizations to implement robust security measures, protect user privacy, and employ techniques that mitigate the risk of these attacks. Regularly monitoring the AI system, updating the security protocols, and staying informed about the latest threats and research in AI security can help organizations stay ahead of potential inference attacks and protect their systems and users.
Why it might happen
An attacker can gain several benefits from a successful inference attack against AI, depending on their objectives and the nature of the targeted system. Some potential gains include:
Sensitive information: Inference attacks can reveal sensitive information about the training data or the individuals involved in the dataset, such as personal, financial, or health-related details. Attackers may exploit this information for identity theft, blackmail, or other malicious purposes.
Insights into the AI model: In some cases, an inference attack can provide the attacker with insights into the AI model's architecture, training techniques, or other proprietary information. This knowledge can be used to steal intellectual property, gain a competitive advantage, or develop more targeted attacks against the AI system.
Membership information: In membership inference attacks, the attacker aims to determine whether a specific data point was part of the AI system's training dataset or not. This information can be valuable in cases where the membership itself is sensitive or indicative of some private attribute, such as a user's affiliation with a particular group or organization.
Exploiting system vulnerabilities: Gaining insights into the AI system's inner workings, data, or decision-making process can help the attacker identify vulnerabilities that they can exploit for further attacks, such as adversarial or poisoning attacks.
Discrediting the AI system or organization: A successful inference attack can damage the reputation of the targeted AI system and the organization responsible for it by demonstrating that the system is not secure or fails to protect user privacy. This could be a goal for competitors, hacktivists, or other malicious actors.
In summary, an attacker can gain valuable information, insights, and potential leverage from a successful inference attack against AI. The attacker's motives can range from financial gain and competitive advantage to causing reputational damage or exposing system vulnerabilities for further exploitation.
A real-world example of an inference attack against AI can be demonstrated using a hypothetical scenario involving a machine learning-based recommender system for an online streaming platform.
An online streaming platform uses a machine learning model to provide personalized movie recommendations to its users. The model is trained on a large dataset containing user preferences, viewing history, and demographic information.
A malicious attacker, who is also a registered user of the platform, wants to gather sensitive information about other users, such as their movie preferences, political inclinations, or other personal attributes that can be inferred from their viewing history.
The attacker starts by querying the recommender system with various movie titles, some of which may be controversial or have a strong political bias.
The attacker carefully observes the system's recommendations and confidence scores for these queries.
Based on the observed recommendations, the attacker identifies patterns or correlations between the input movie titles and the recommended titles, inferring information about the users' preferences and demographic attributes.
The attacker may further refine their queries to gather more specific information about targeted users or to confirm their findings.
As a result of this inference attack, the attacker gains sensitive information about users' movie preferences and potentially their political inclinations or other personal attributes. This information can be used for malicious purposes, such as targeted advertising, social engineering attacks, or even blackmail.
In this example, the streaming platform should have implemented privacy-preserving techniques, such as differential privacy or federated learning, to protect user data and prevent inference attacks. Regular monitoring of system behavior, user interactions, and access patterns could also help identify and mitigate such attacks.
How to Mitigate
Mitigating inference attacks against AI involves implementing various techniques and strategies to protect the AI system, its users, and the underlying data. Some approaches to mitigate inference attacks include:
Differential Privacy: This technique adds carefully calibrated noise to the AI system's outputs, making it difficult for an attacker to infer sensitive information about the training data while preserving the system's overall utility. Differential privacy provides a mathematical guarantee of privacy, limiting the amount of information that can be leaked through the system's outputs.
Federated Learning: Instead of aggregating all the training data in a central location, federated learning trains AI models on local devices or servers. The models are then combined into a global model, without sharing the raw data itself. This decentralized approach makes it challenging for attackers to gain access to the complete training dataset, reducing the risk of inference attacks.
Secure Multi-Party Computation (SMPC): This cryptographic technique allows multiple parties to collaboratively compute a function on their inputs while keeping the inputs private. By using SMPC during the training process, AI systems can protect sensitive data and prevent leakage of information that could be exploited in inference attacks.
Data obfuscation: Modify or transform the training data in a way that preserves its utility while reducing the risk of exposing sensitive information. Techniques such as data anonymization, aggregation, or generalization can help protect user privacy and make it more difficult for attackers to execute inference attacks.
Access control and monitoring: Implement strict access controls, authentication, and authorization mechanisms to limit the ability of potential attackers to query the AI system. Regularly monitor system usage patterns, query logs, and user behavior to detect and respond to potential inference attacks.
Regular model updates and retraining: Frequently update and retrain AI models to reduce the risk of exposure to inference attacks. Retraining models with new data and incorporating privacy-preserving techniques can help minimize the impact of an inference attack.
Research and awareness: Stay informed about the latest research and developments in AI security and privacy. Understanding the potential vulnerabilities and threats can help organizations implement appropriate countermeasures and mitigate the risk of inference attacks.
By combining these techniques and strategies, organizations can create a more robust defense against inference attacks, protect user privacy, and maintain the integrity of their AI systems.
How to monitor/What to capture
Detecting an inference attack against AI requires monitoring various aspects of the AI system, its usage, and user behavior. Some key elements to monitor include:
Query patterns: Keep track of the queries submitted to the AI system, looking for unusual or suspicious patterns. An attacker may submit a series of carefully crafted queries or probe the system with a high volume of requests to gather information.
User behavior: Monitor user activity, including login attempts, session durations, and interaction patterns. Unusual behavior, such as multiple failed login attempts, sudden spikes in activity, or repeated queries from the same user, could indicate a potential inference attack.
Access logs: Review access logs to identify any unauthorized access or attempts to gain access to the AI system, its data, or its underlying infrastructure. Regularly audit the logs for signs of suspicious activity or potential security breaches.
System performance: Monitor the AI system's performance metrics, such as response times, accuracy, and resource usage. Unexpected changes in performance may signal an ongoing attack or an attempt to extract information from the system.
Confidence scores: Observe the confidence scores or probabilities returned by the AI system for its predictions. An attacker might attempt to exploit the system's confidence scores to gain insights into the training data or the model's internal workings.
Data anomalies: Regularly assess the training data and the AI model's outputs for any anomalies or unexpected patterns. Unusual trends or deviations from the expected behavior could be indicative of an inference attack or manipulation of the system.
Security alerts and vulnerability reports: Stay informed about security alerts, vulnerability reports, and the latest research in AI security and privacy. This information can help identify potential threats and vulnerabilities in the AI system, enabling timely detection and mitigation of inference attacks.
By monitoring these elements and maintaining a proactive approach to AI system security, organizations can detect potential inference attacks, respond quickly, and protect sensitive data and user privacy.
[Subscribe to the RSS feed for this blog]
[Subscribe to the Weekly Microsoft Sentinel Newsletter]
[Subscribe to the Weekly Microsoft Defender Newsletter]
[Subscribe to the Weekly Azure OpenAI Newsletter]
[Learn KQL with the Must Learn KQL series and book]
[Learn AI Security with the Must Learn AI Security series and book]
Rod’s Blog is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.